2025 Red Sox and MLB Thread

The Boston Red Sox have made their first serious move in MLB free agency.

The Red Sox have agreed to a one-year, $10.75 million contract with left-handed reliever Aroldis Chapman, ESPN's Jeff Passan reports. The completion of the deal is pending a physical, per Passan.

Boston brass insisted this offseason it would take action after missing the postseason for the third consecutive year, and it appears the team's first step is addressing the bullpen.

Chapman, 36, posted a 3.79 ERA over 61.2 innings with the Pittsburgh Pirates last season. The Red Sox will be his fifth team in four years.

Kenley Jansen replacement, with a smaller price tag.
 
The Boston Red Sox are desperate to play in the postseason again, and there are no shortcuts to getting there.

After three years with no October baseball, the Red Sox seem to be gearing up for a spending spree. The buzz around Major League Baseball has suggested that Boston will pursue some of the big-name free agents, but so far, all they've done is sign Aroldis Chapman for $10.75 million.

While the Red Sox are rightfully pursuing superstar outfielder Juan Soto, their greatest need remains starting pitching. Tanner Houck, Kutter Crawford, and Brayan Bello can all be quality big-league starters, but they need an ace in front of them to set the tone.

With only two true aces left on the free-agent market, urgency must be high in the suites at Fenway Park. Fortunately, one recent projection sees the Red Sox at the top of the heap for one of those top arms.

On Tuesday, Tim Kelly of Bleacher Report tabbed the Red Sox as the number-one prospective destination for Corbin Burnes, the four-time All-Star who pitched for the rival Baltimore Orioles in 2024.

"Boston is one of the few teams still allegedly in the mix for Juan Soto. And before Blake Snell went off the board to the Dodgers, there was talk of the Red Sox wanting to bring in not just one but two of the big three of Burnes, Snell and Max Fried," Kelly said.

"It's unlikely they'll get Soto, but it does feel likely they'll get Burnes or Fried. And if the Mets prioritize Fried—or simply don't bid as much for Burnes as the Red Sox do—he could be relocating to Fenway Park."

Burnes, 30, has been one of MLB's most dominant pitchers of the last half-decade. He won a Cy Young in 2021 and has a 52-31 record, 2.88 ERA, and 946 strikeouts since the start of the 2020 season, spanning 134 starts.

Where things get interesting is the value of a potential Burnes contract. Jim Bowden of The Athletic projects him for a seven-year, $247 million deal, which would make him the highest-paid pitcher in Red Sox history. And so far, the rates have been exorbitant for the starting pitchers who have signed this winter.

The Red Sox cannot afford to be coy this offseason. They have to set the market and then exceed any counteroffers. If Burnes is the man they think can lead the rotation, and there's every indication he can be, then they must do whatever it takes to get him to Boston.
 
The Boston Red Sox are desperate to play in the postseason again, and there are no shortcuts to getting there.

After three years with no October baseball, the Red Sox seem to be gearing up for a spending spree. The buzz around Major League Baseball has suggested that Boston will pursue some of the big-name free agents, but so far, all they've done is sign Aroldis Chapman for $10.75 million.

While the Red Sox are rightfully pursuing superstar outfielder Juan Soto, their greatest need remains starting pitching. Tanner Houck, Kutter Crawford, and Brayan Bello can all be quality big-league starters, but they need an ace in front of them to set the tone.

With only two true aces left on the free-agent market, urgency must be high in the suites at Fenway Park. Fortunately, one recent projection sees the Red Sox at the top of the heap for one of those top arms.

On Tuesday, Tim Kelly of Bleacher Report tabbed the Red Sox as the number-one prospective destination for Corbin Burnes, the four-time All-Star who pitched for the rival Baltimore Orioles in 2024.

"Boston is one of the few teams still allegedly in the mix for Juan Soto. And before Blake Snell went off the board to the Dodgers, there was talk of the Red Sox wanting to bring in not just one but two of the big three of Burnes, Snell and Max Fried," Kelly said.

"It's unlikely they'll get Soto, but it does feel likely they'll get Burnes or Fried. And if the Mets prioritize Fried—or simply don't bid as much for Burnes as the Red Sox do—he could be relocating to Fenway Park."

Burnes, 30, has been one of MLB's most dominant pitchers of the last half-decade. He won a Cy Young in 2021 and has a 52-31 record, 2.88 ERA, and 946 strikeouts since the start of the 2020 season, spanning 134 starts.

Where things get interesting is the value of a potential Burnes contract. Jim Bowden of The Athletic projects him for a seven-year, $247 million deal, which would make him the highest-paid pitcher in Red Sox history. And so far, the rates have been exorbitant for the starting pitchers who have signed this winter.

The Red Sox cannot afford to be coy this offseason. They have to set the market and then exceed any counteroffers. If Burnes is the man they think can lead the rotation, and there's every indication he can be, then they must do whatever it takes to get him to Boston.
Ok, what the rundown on MLB roster spending? I know there is no NFL style cap, but there has to be some kind of limit, right?
 
Ok, what the rundown on MLB roster spending? I know there is no NFL style cap, but there has to be some kind of limit, right?
The 2024 Major League Baseball (MLB) salary cap, also known as the Competitive Balance Tax, is $237 million. This is a threshold that teams must stay under to avoid dipping into the luxury tax.


The luxury tax has the following surcharges for teams that exceed the threshold:
  • First year: 20% tax on all overages
  • Second consecutive year: 30% tax
  • Third consecutive year or more: 50% tax
  • $20–$40 million: 12% surcharge
  • $40–$60 million: 42.5% surcharge in the first year, and 45% for each consecutive year after that
  • $60 million or more: 60% surcharge
 
Ok, what the rundown on MLB roster spending? I know there is no NFL style cap, but there has to be some kind of limit, right?


As LS has demonstrated with his posts, MLB has a cap without having a cap. Even the strongest union in sports was eventually stupid enough to agree to one.
 
Power hitters put asses in the seats. That's all they care about.


But the supposed farm system studs are all non-pitchers, and they have enough outfielders who can't field. And doing things like winning games and making the playoffs will put butts in seats, too. In theory:

  • Sign 2 elite pitchers and you fix the rotation.
  • Bring up the kids and you fix the everyday lineup.

Then you're just looking to make any left/right adjustments in the lineup, and bolstering the bullpen. It may take a year for the kids to adjust, but people like watching rookies develop, as long as they think they're watching future greatness.
 
Back
Top