i agree. it is a two way street...not one.That's not how team sports work.
Is there any good reason Brady can't come back another year? Brady, Belichick, cap space and draft picks spent on two top receivers and o-line. Let's do it.
tb elevated the offense no doubt. points allowed unfortunately includes the pick sixes and shitty field position resulting from jameis winston's 87,944 ints the prior year. just having a qb who wasn't a t.o. machine "improved" the defense.Tampa was 29th in points allowed the year before Brady arrived, and 3rd in points scored
View attachment 13717
i agree. it is a two way street...not one.
tb elevated the offense no doubt. points allowed unfortunately includes the pick sixes and shitty field position resulting from jameis winston's 87,944 ints the prior year. just having a qb who wasn't a t.o. machine "improved" the defense.
i've never been an "all one guy" person (coach or player) and never will be for football. my mind will never be changed about that. basketball has 5 people playing both ways. a single great player IS more impactful.458 points, and 29th out of 32.
v.
355 points, and 8th out of 32
Let's not go blaming Winston for all of that. And let's stop trying to diminish Brady in order to buttress BB.
i've never been an "all one guy" person (coach or player) and never will be for football. my mind will never be changed about that. basketball has 5 people playing both ways. a single great player IS more impactful.
i don't blame winston for all of the shit defense.but putting your defense in shit positions has a gigantic impact on the defense. tb didn't do that so i am crediting him partially with the defensive improvement.
i'm not trying for that. even when tb was described as a "system qb"early on in his career i would and explain how dumb that was. it's just that over time,people outside of us pats fans have more come to realize his greatness. so now more tend to diminish bb's role. I have always been one to say they don't have the success they had without both of them. even Brady says that. The way I would always put it when people would ask me who was more responsible is I would say neither, they make each other's jobs easier.belichick never has to worry about his quarterback and Brady never has to worry about the coaching.OK, but you're erroneously diminishing Brady in an attempt to buttress Belichick.
The last 5 years proved Brady was THE reason. We saw Brady at ages 43-45 without Bill on a new team, new conference, clown for a HC and he thrived. BTW, Rodgers right now is about to turn 41 and is toast for comparison. Bill without Brady is a below .500 coach and his last 2 seasons in NE were a complete dumpster fire. So much so that his only avenue to coach again is at an ACC school.i'm not trying for that. even when tb was described as a "system qb"early on in his career i would and explain how dumb that was. it's just that over time,people outside of us pats fans have more come to realize his greatness. so now more tend to diminish bb's role. I have always been one to say they don't have the success they had without both of them. even Brady says that. The way I would always put it when people would ask me who was more responsible is I would say neither, they make each other's jobs easier.belichick never has to worry about his quarterback and Brady never has to worry about the coaching.
The last 5 years proved Brady was THE reason. We saw Brady at ages 43-45 without Bill on a new team, new conference, clown for a HC and he thrived. BTW, Rodgers right now is about to turn 41 and is toast for comparison. Bill without Brady is a below .500 coach and his last 2 seasons in NE were a complete dumpster fire. So much so that his only avenue to coach again is at an ACC school.
If Brady had been paired with an offensive minded HC like a Reid, Payton or Mike Shanny I believe he would have won more than the 6 rings. Especially if he had a GM like Veach or Lynch. Bill cost Brady rings with so many GM and coaching brain farts.
You have to look at the totality of each season not just one game. Do the 2001 Pats get to the Bowl or even the playoffs with Bledsoe?I can just as easily take the first and last SB rings off Brady.
A defensive mastermind won both of those games. No debate there.
You have to look at the totality of each season not just one game. Do the 2001 Pats get to the Bowl or even the playoffs with Bledsoe?
Does any other QB besides Brady go into Arrowhead and beat Mahomes in a shoot out at age 41?
I am not dismissing him. I believe he is a defensive savant but I also believe Brady would have flourished more under an offensive savant and a much better GM.I agree. I am a Brady apologist through and through. He can do no wrong to me.
But dismissing Bill as an albatross around Brady's neck is a dangerous game. That BB defense certainly benefitted Brady quite a bit. Especially in those early years.
I can just as easily take the first and last SB rings off Brady.