Lord Chevy
I'm home
Well. here's a real fucking idiot for you...
View: https://x.com/_MLFootball/status/1795910666936574313
Tom did go a bit bitchy - I won't say full-on pussy, but he did let some of it get to him.
Well. here's a real fucking idiot for you...
View: https://x.com/_MLFootball/status/1795910666936574313
I didn't see it, just bits and pieces here and there. This guy's bringing up Brady just to get attention. Fucking loser.Tom did go a bit bitchy - I won't say full-on pussy, but he did let some of it get to him.
Still absolutely insane they suspended Brady over a full year later because they didn’t believe scienceNo pic, no video - just some numbers
Tom Brady's Average Season -
Comp:337 ATT:524 COMP%:64% YARDS:3878 TD:28 INT:9
No adjusting for 2000 (a small part of 1 game), 2001 (missed game 1, only played part of game 2), 2008 (SEI in game 1), or 2016 (4 game suspension). Just a raw average of regular season totals divided by 23.
Insane.
His average playoff game (he's played in 48, going 35 wins, 13 losses) is 25/40/279/2TD/1INT
He may have, at some point, been generally aware that possibly, in some manner heretofore undiscovered, or at least generally should have posited the possibilities surrounding the situation of which he was at times present or at least in the greater area where such incidents could may have taken place, so that ... ummm ....Still absolutely insane they suspended Brady over a full year later because they didn’t believe science
It would have been a better look just to say “we have absolutely no clue how we’d even attempt to figure this out scientifically, because of the weather changes, and we never anticipated this, so we can’t prove it. Still we think based on circumstantial evidence a rule was probably violated.”He may have, at some point, been generally aware that possibly, in some manner heretofore undiscovered, or at least generally should have posited the possibilities surrounding the situation of which he was at times present or at least in the greater area where such incidents could may have taken place, so that ... ummm ....
How do you cook science? Science is indisputable, right?It would have been a better look just to say “we have absolutely no clue how we’d even attempt to figure this out scientifically, because of the weather changes, and we never anticipated this, so we can’t prove it. Still we think based on circumstantial evidence a rule was probably violated.”
The Exponent report just confirmed all the bias. If the “science” is cooked, you can only imagine how cooked the investigation was.
It would have been a better look just to say “we have absolutely no clue how we’d even attempt to figure this out scientifically, because of the weather changes, and we never anticipated this, so we can’t prove it. Still we think based on circumstantial evidence a rule was probably violated.”
The Exponent report just confirmed all the bias. If the “science” is cooked, you can only imagine how cooked the investigation was.