Tom Brady & Patriots Dynasty Divinity Thread

Tom did go a bit bitchy - I won't say full-on pussy, but he did let some of it get to him.
I didn't see it, just bits and pieces here and there. This guy's bringing up Brady just to get attention. Fucking loser.
 
I hate Hollywood, Hollywood people, etc so I didn’t even watch the roast. If Kim Kardashian and company are there, that means staged, scripted phoniness, and it isn’t for me, even if Tom Brady is the subject. I’ll bet money most of the jokes were written by professionals.
 
No pic, no video - just some numbers

Tom Brady's Average Season -

Comp:337 ATT:524 COMP%:64% YARDS:3878 TD:28 INT:9

No adjusting for 2000 (a small part of 1 game), 2001 (missed game 1, only played part of game 2), 2008 (SEI in game 1), or 2016 (4 game suspension). Just a raw average of regular season totals divided by 23.

Insane.

His average playoff game (he's played in 48, going 35 wins, 13 losses) is 25/40/279/2TD/1INT
 
No pic, no video - just some numbers

Tom Brady's Average Season -

Comp:337 ATT:524 COMP%:64% YARDS:3878 TD:28 INT:9

No adjusting for 2000 (a small part of 1 game), 2001 (missed game 1, only played part of game 2), 2008 (SEI in game 1), or 2016 (4 game suspension). Just a raw average of regular season totals divided by 23.

Insane.

His average playoff game (he's played in 48, going 35 wins, 13 losses) is 25/40/279/2TD/1INT
Still absolutely insane they suspended Brady over a full year later because they didn’t believe science
 
Still absolutely insane they suspended Brady over a full year later because they didn’t believe science
He may have, at some point, been generally aware that possibly, in some manner heretofore undiscovered, or at least generally should have posited the possibilities surrounding the situation of which he was at times present or at least in the greater area where such incidents could may have taken place, so that ... ummm ....

giphy.webp
 
He may have, at some point, been generally aware that possibly, in some manner heretofore undiscovered, or at least generally should have posited the possibilities surrounding the situation of which he was at times present or at least in the greater area where such incidents could may have taken place, so that ... ummm ....

giphy.webp
It would have been a better look just to say “we have absolutely no clue how we’d even attempt to figure this out scientifically, because of the weather changes, and we never anticipated this, so we can’t prove it. Still we think based on circumstantial evidence a rule was probably violated.”

The Exponent report just confirmed all the bias. If the “science” is cooked, you can only imagine how cooked the investigation was.
 
It would have been a better look just to say “we have absolutely no clue how we’d even attempt to figure this out scientifically, because of the weather changes, and we never anticipated this, so we can’t prove it. Still we think based on circumstantial evidence a rule was probably violated.”

The Exponent report just confirmed all the bias. If the “science” is cooked, you can only imagine how cooked the investigation was.
How do you cook science? Science is indisputable, right? :rolleyes:
 
It would have been a better look just to say “we have absolutely no clue how we’d even attempt to figure this out scientifically, because of the weather changes, and we never anticipated this, so we can’t prove it. Still we think based on circumstantial evidence a rule was probably violated.”

The Exponent report just confirmed all the bias. If the “science” is cooked, you can only imagine how cooked the investigation was.


The insurmountable problem, in the end, was the judicial system's idiotic over-reliance on arbitration.
 
Back
Top