Imagine Gronk with these rulestough to be a defender these days
Problem is there's no way to correctly enforce it objectivelyI'm not a fan of that tackle. Not sure who started this type of tackle, but it is pretty cheap. Just imagine you're running full speed and having someone lasso around your waist from behind and pulling your weight to the ground.
I'm not a fan of that tackle. Not sure who started this type of tackle, but it is pretty cheap. Just imagine you're running full speed and having someone lasso around your waist from behind and pulling your weight to the ground.
Of course not, it will be completely arbitrary, and used to make sure the 'right' teams are winning important games.Problem is there's no way to correctly enforce it objectively
You mean the Chiefs.Of course not, it will be completely arbitrary, and used to make sure the 'right' teams are winning important games.
Yep. They should just walk back all of this - “defenseless” receivers, helmet to helmet, all that stuff, instead of doubling down. They seem bound and determined to ruin the game.This is the NFL banning a tackle that was made important by the NFL banning other things. You can only hit a certain way, from a certain angle, etc..., and every time they limit those ways and angles, it necessitates the sort of change that led to the newly banned tackle.
Can't lunge high. Can't lunge low. Can't grab the collar. And so on, and so on...
I get the safety and whatever but part of the NFL lore is the violence and you can't tell me otherwise. That's why they get paid handsomelyYep. They should just walk back all of this - “defenseless” receivers, helmet to helmet, all that stuff, instead of doubling down. They seem bound and determined to ruin the game.
Exactly. These guys know what they’re getting into when they sign the dotted line. It’s a violent game. They are free to enter another career if they choose.I get the safety and whatever but part of the NFL lore is the violence and you can't tell me otherwise. That's why they get paid handsomely